Social Psychology

Psychology 720
Science Hall East 2013
Tuesdays 2:00-4:40

Professor: Elizabeth L. Haines, Ph.D.
Classroom: 2038 Science Hall East
Lab: 2013 Science
Email: hainese@wpunj.edu
Phone: 973.720.2500

Office Hours: T 10:00-11:00 and TR 10:00-11:00 and by appointment or Skype


41CP89Bu6iL._SX328_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Required Texts

Maddux, J. E., & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.). (2011). Social Psychological Foundations of Clinical Psychology. Guilford Press.

Other primary source material to be distributed in class or on the web.

Prerequisites

Fourth Year Psy.D. status.


Email

Email and frequent access to Blackboard are requirements for this course. You will need to check your email and Blackboard 24 hours prior to each class meeting time. It is a university policy that students use their university email for all course-related maters.

Course Description

Social Psychology provides students with an in-depth examination of how people are affected by how people think about, relate to, and are affected by others. This course surveys the major theories, principles, and methodologies of social psychology as applied to clinical practice. There is a strong emphasis on the cognitive components of social interactions.

In this course, we will use an evidence-based approach for understanding how social psychological principles, theories and methods operate in clinical practice. To that end, we will evaluate data from rigorous social science research to explain the social psychological approach to cognition, emotions, and behaviors. While personal story telling, examples, and experiences may be used to exemplify research findings, examples are not a substitute (or generally equivalent to) research evidence demonstrating how social cognition operates in social interaction and the clinical experience.

Although attitudes and behaviors forged through experience are strong, easily accessible, and resistant to change, it is my goal to present research findings for you to consider as alternative interpretations for how you typically think about social and self-perception. Psychology, at its best, provides a completely different view of the things we think we know best. Have an open mind, be a critical thinker, and drive with your social experimental glasses on.

The course will follow a questioning critical thinking format. Students are expected to guide their learning process. I have permission to stretch you. No laptops or cellphones during class except for the person who is taking minutes for the day. Tablets are permitted for taking notes by hand and or reading and marking up primary source material.

Attendance

Attendance is required.

University Closing Due to Weather/Emergency

When classes are canceled by the university, you will receive a short at home assignment for the day that will be due at the next class meeting. Please check blackboard for these assignments and when weather conditions are poor.

Evaluation

Presentations (50%)

Each student will give two presentations to the group. A first presentation will be as group leader for the day's material. The group leader will choose the chapter from the text, assign at least one primary source empirical article, compose discussion questions for the day (with answers), and write a self evaluation as the group's peer leader. In a second presentation, the presenter will choose will five cognitive biases, develop a point of view regarding how they should be understood in clinical practice and propose actionable mitigation strategies from primary source research. A self evaluation of this presentation is also required.

External Writing: Discussion Questions (20%)

There will be nine assignments to evaluate the application of social psychological themes into the client-practitioner role. These assignments will be in the form of discussion questions that will be used to stimulate students’ critical thinking and application of course material.

In Class Writing (10%)

In class writing activities will be used to assess understanding of readings.

Final Exam (30%)

A final exam on the social psychological point of view on clinical psychology will integrate learners' knowledge of course material. This integrate will include the following elements (a) informs and extends your practice (b) connects social psychological language and content areas to clinical experience (c) applies this social psychological point of view to your clinical scenarios and techniques using examples.

Communication

Communication is essential to the learning process. If the question is brief, email is the most efficient method of contact. Communication between students is strongly encouraged.

Academic Honesty

It is expected that all work handed in for this class is based upon your learning and personal effort. Violations of academic integrity, including cheating, plagiarismcollusion, and lying, can not be tolerated. Please familiarize yourself with the University's Academic Honesty Policy. 

Course Schedule
This schedule is a general outline and is subject to change.

Day/Date

Text Reading

Articles and Supplemental Reading

September 10th

Chapter 1:  Introduction
Chapter 2: The Role of Self Awareness and Self Evaluation in Dysfunctional Patterns of Thought. Emotion, and Behavior

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362

September 17th

Chapter 16: The Social Psychology of Clinical Judgment

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science185(4157), 1124-1131.

Gladwell, M. (2007). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. Back Bay Books.

Kahneman, D., (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

September 24th

 Chapter 5: Self Regulatory Strength and Psychological Adjustment: Implications for  the Limited Resource Model of Self Regulation

 

Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: an experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1318-1335.


October 1st

Chapter 7: Strategies of Setting and Implementing Goals: Mental Contrasting and Implementation Intentions

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta‐analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119.

October 8th

Chapter 11: Social Comparison Theory


Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206.

October 15th

Student Chapter

Chapter, Readings to be Assigned

October 22nd

Student Chapter

  Chapter, Readings to be Assigned

October 29th

Student Chapter

  Chapter, Readings to be Assigned

November 5th

Student Chapter

Chapter, Readings to be Assigned

November 12th

Cognitive Bias in Self and Other Perception: Haines

Directed Readings: Cognitive Bias

November 19th

Cognitive Bias In Self and Other Perception I

Directed Readings: Cognitive Bias

November 26th

Cognitive Bias In Self and Other Perception II

Directed Readings: Cognitive Bias

December 3th

Cognitive Bias In Self and Other Perception III

Directed Readings: Cognitive Bias

December 10th

Cognitive Bias In Self and Other Perception IV

Directed Readings: Cognitive Bias

December 17th

 Final Exam Presentation 2:00-4:00

 Final Exam Presentation

 

Grading Rubric for  In Class Presentation

 

Category

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Fair

Content

Depth and breadth

Very good depth or breadth

Good depth or breadth

Fair depth or breadth

Clarity

Concepts clearly explained, Excellent supporting examples

Concepts partially explained, Good supporting examples

Concepts explained but ideas or examples unclear

Concepts not well explained

Organization

Material well organized

Material generally organized but some lack of flow

Material somewhat organized, several problems with flow

Material not well organized

Visual Aids

Engaging and relevant to content

Engaging but not relevant to content

Somewhat engaging or relevant to content

Neither engaging nor relevant to content

Style

Poised, confident, excellent speech rate and volume

Mostly poised and confident, some difficult with fluidity of speech

Somewhat poised and confident, speech rate or volume problems

Nervous, fast speech rate, low volume

Grading Rubric for Peer Facilitated Class

Category

A: Excellent

B: Very Good

C: Fair

Readings referenced

Assigned readings are described in response to discussion question with sufficient depth of understanding

Some assigned readings are described in response to discussion question and/or depth of understanding is good but incomplete in some areas

Assigned readings not described in response to discussion question and/or response lacks depth/understanding of material is incomplete

Integration

Readings are fully synthesized in support of response. Concepts are analyzed, connected, compared and contrasted across readings in a sophisticated manner.

Readings are somewhat synthesized in support of response. Concepts are somewhat connected across readings but lacks expected sophistication (e.g., more emphasis on summary than analysis).

Readings are described/summarized without any synthesis or integration across concepts.

Critical analysis

Readings are used to analyze discussion question and/or in support of ideas/ response to discussion question.

Readings are somewhat used to analyze discussion question and/or partially support ideas/ response to discussion question.

Readings are described or summarized without any analysis

Writing skills

Proper grammar, APA style, objective tone (vs. opinion), fluid expression and transition across paragraphs

Some errors with respect to grammar, APA style, tone, fluidity of expression and transition across paragraphs

Many mechanical and/or stylistic errors

Grading Rubric for Reflection Papers

Category

A: Excellent

B: Very Good

C: Fair

Readings referenced

Assigned readings are described in response to reflection question with sufficient depth of understanding

Some assigned readings are described in response to reflection question and/or depth of understanding is good but incomplete in some areas

Assigned readings not described in response to reflection question and/or response lacks depth/understanding of material is incomplete

Integration

Readings are fully synthesized in support of response. Concepts are analyzed, connected, compared and contrasted across readings in a sophisticated manner.

Readings are somewhat synthesized in support of response. Concepts are somewhat connected across readings but lacks expected sophistication (e.g., more emphasis on summary than analysis).

Readings are described/summarized without any synthesis or integration across concepts.

Profession Wide Competencies

Reflection is responsive and represents profession wide competencies of assessment, ethics/legal concerns, professional values, attitudes and behaviors

Reflection is somewhat responsive and represents profession wide competencies of assessment, ethics/legal concerns, professional values, attitudes and behaviors

Reflection is not responsive and does not represent profession wide competencies of assessment, ethics/legal concerns, professional values, attitudes and behaviors

Writing skills

Proper grammar, APA style, objective tone (vs. opinion), fluid expression and transition across paragraphs

Some errors with respect to grammar, APA style, tone, fluidity of expression and transition across paragraphs

Many mechanical and/or stylistic errors

       

Grading Rubric for Critical Analysis Paper

Category

A: Excellent

B: Very Good

C: Fair

Readings referenced

Selected readings are from appropriate journals and relevant to topic

Selected readings are from some appropriate journals and/or partially relevant to topic

Selected readings are not from appropriate journals

Question and Thesis statement

Clear, concise, and specific question and thesis statement /statement of purpose that demonstrates clear argument or cause-effect statement

Question and thesis statement is somewhat clear and specific, but lacks argument or purpose

No question or thesis statement or question/thesis are vague and non specific

DSK Integration

Two or more DSK are covered and integrated in paper (e.g., research methods and developmental; developmental and cognitive; biological and developmental)

Two or more DSK are covered in paper (e.g., research methods and developmental; developmental and cognitive; biological and developmental) but they are not integrated

Only one DSK is covered.

Integration

Readings are fully synthesized in support of topic. Concepts are analyzed, connected, compared and contrasted across readings in a sophisticated manner.

Readings are somewhat synthesized in support of topic. Concepts are somewhat connected across readings but lacks expected sophistication (e.g., more emphasis on summary than analysis).

Readings are described/summarized without any synthesis or integration across concepts.

Critical analysis

Readings are used to analyze topic and/or in support of thesis. Effectively and appropriately evaluates methodological rigor of empirical evidence.

 

 

Readings are somewhat used to analyze thesis and/or partially support thesis. Partially evaluates methodological rigor of empirical evidence

Readings are described or summarized without any analysis. No evaluation of methodological rigor of empirical evidence.

Current controversies

Clear exposition of current controversies or innovations in the field.

Some exposition of current controversies or innovations in the field

No exposition of current controversies or innovations in the field

Writing skills

Proper grammar, APA style, objective tone (vs. opinion), fluid expression and transition across paragraphs

Some errors with respect to grammar, APA style, tone, fluidity of expression and transition across paragraphs

Many mechanical and/or stylistic errors